Grant, et al v. Gusman, et al
| Rodney Grant |
| Marlin Gusman, Carmen DeSadier, Sidney Holt, Djuana Bierria, James LeBlanc, Timothy Hooper, Chris Stinson, LaSalle Management Company, LLC and Unidentified Parties |
| 2:2017cv02797 |
| April 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Nannette Jolivette Brown |
| Daniel E. Knowles |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
269
ORDER AND REASONS: The 261 Motion for Attorney's Fees is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as set forth in document. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Rodney Grant is hereby awarded $103,830.84 in attorney's fees and costs recoverable against OPSO Defendants. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 1/19/2023. (jls)
|
|
Filing
231
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 129 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, as set forth in document. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that DOC Defendants' 143 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIE D IN PART, as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's state law tort claims against Warden Hooper in his individual capacity brought under the theory of respondeat superior are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief against Secretary LeBlanc in his official capacity is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 3/31/2021. (jls)
|
|
Filing
230
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 133 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that OPSO Defendants' 136 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. OPSO Defendants& #039; Motion for Summary Judgment is granted to the extent that OPSO Defendants request dismissal of Plaintiff's requests for injunctive and declaratory relief under federal law. OPSO Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is denied in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's requests for injunctive and declaratory relief under federal law are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 3/30/2021. (jls)
|
|
Filing
206
ORDER AND REASONS DENYING 123 Motion for Sanctions, or in the Alternative, to Compel Preservation and Production of Documents, as set forth in document. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 4/13/2020. (jls)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that OPSO Defendants' 50 Motion to Dismiss IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent that the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims for monetary relief against OPSO Defendants in their individual capacities. I T IS FURTHER ORDERED that OPSO Defendants' Motion to Dismiss IS DENIED IN PART as to Plaintiff's claims for declaratory and injunctive relief against OPSO Defendants in their individual capacities and as to Plaintiff's Monell claim aga inst Sheriff Gusman. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that OPSO Defendants' Motion to Dismiss IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART as to Plaintiff's state-law claims against OPSO Defendants. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 8/14/2018. (mmv)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Sheriff Marlin Gusman, Captain Sidney Holt, and Corey Amacker's 25 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, in part, to the extent that Plaintiff's Section 1983 claim based on respondeat superior liability are hereby DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 25 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to all other claims at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Rule 7(a)(7) reply as to Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims against DOC Defendants in their individual capacities and to amend the complaint within fourteen days of this Order to cure the deficiencies noted, if possible. Signed by Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 3/29/2018. (mmv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
