Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. v. O'Neill
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. |
Brian D. O'Neill |
2:2017cv02825 |
April 3, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Out of State |
Martin L.C. Feldman |
Joseph C. Wilkinson |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 129 ORDER AND REASONS granting 112 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court. ORDERED that the Protective Order be narrowed in scope to (1) communications regarding solicitation of business from any of Gallagher's clients o r former clients; (2) communications prior to the transfer of business; (3) communications after the transfer of business that reference or concern O'Neill or Gallagher; (4) communications between O'Neill and other Marsh employees that refe rence or concern Gallagher or any current or former clients of Gallagher; (5) communications between O'Neill and current and former clients of Gallagher; and (6) communications referencing information that Gallagher alleges O'Neill improperly disclosed. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 12/20/2018. (clc) |
Filing 106 ORDER AND REASONS: The presiding district judge has affirmed in all respects my order of November 6, 2017, Record Doc. No. 89 , but has "remanded for further consideration of the redactions in the documents not included in the in camera review. " Record Doc. No. 105 at p. 2 (emphasis added). To comply with the presiding district judges directive, I can only provide the following general order as set forth in document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr on 11/27/2017.(mmv) (NEF: HON. MARTIN L.C. FELDMAN) |
Filing 100 ORDER AND REASONS granting 84 Motion for Extension of time to disclose expert witnesses. ORDERED that ONeill submit his expert report by November 28, 2017. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 11/15/2017. (clc) |
Filing 91 ORDER AND REASONS: Having considered the motion papers, the record as a whole and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that the 65 motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth in document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr on 11/8/2017. (mmv) |
Filing 33 ORDER AND REASONS granting 29 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaim with prejudice. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 7/26/2017. (clc) |
Filing 16 ORDER AND REASONS denying 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 6/14/2017. (clc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. v. O'Neill | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | |
Represented By: | Philip Anthony Franco |
Represented By: | Lauren Lopresto Tafaro |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Brian D. O'Neill | |
Represented By: | Susan Fahey Desmond |
Represented By: | Kelly Dugas Moscona |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.