Talamo v. Fresenius Medical Care Management, AG et al
Case Number: 2:2017cv03509
Filed: May 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
Nature of Suit: Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a))
Cause of Action: 31:3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER AND REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 84 ) is GRANTED, and all of Talamo's claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 7/3/2019. (sa)
May 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER AND REASONS: ORDERED that Defendants' 56 Motion for Judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED in part. Count II is dismissed with prejudice, except that the remedy paragraph from Count II is merged into Count I; Count III is dismissed with p rejudice; the retaliation claims asserted in Counts IV and V are dismissed with prejudice as to the Individual Defendants; all of Talamo's conspiracy allegations in Counts IV, V, and VI are dismissed with prejudice, except for the claim that Melissa Lapworth and Heather Clark conspired to intentionally inflict emotional distress; and Talamo's defamation claim in Count VI is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 5/29/19. (clc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Talamo v. Fresenius Medical Care Management, AG et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?