Port Marigny, LLC et al v. City of Mandeville et al
Port Marigny, LLC and Pittman Assets, LLC |
Mandeville City, David Ellis, John Keller, Clay Madden, Michael Pulaski and Laure Sica |
2:2017cv04727 |
May 5, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Orleans |
Carl Barbier |
Michael North |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 150 ORDER AND REASONS: Before the Court are a Motion to Interpret Consent Judgment (Rec. Doc. 133 ) filed by Plaintiffs, Port Marigny, LLC and Pittman Assets, LLC and a Motion to Strike Declaration of Richard L. Muller (Rec. Doc. 143 ) filed by Defe ndant, the City of Mandeville ("the City"). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Interpret Consent Judgment (Rec. Doc. 133) is GRANTED. The Court has interpreted the consent judgment and finds that the five-year term to obtain a build ing permit closes on April 3, 2024. The Permitted Uses are also effective until April 3, 2024. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion to Strike Declaration of Richard L. Muller (Rec. Doc. 143) is GRANTED. For the reasons explained above, the Court need not consider the information contained in the Muller Declaration to interpret the parties' Consent Judgment. Signed by Judge Carl J Barbier on 4/2/24. (cg) |
Filing 17 ORDER AND REASONS granting 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 4/12/2018. (cg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.