Perkins v. Pel Hughes Printing, LLC et al
Kathy Perkins |
Pel Hughes Printing, LLC and John Victor Hughes |
2:2017cv06689 |
July 12, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Jefferson |
Karen Wells Roby |
Jay C. Zainey |
Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 ORDER denying 72 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 2/19/19. (jrc) |
Filing 74 ORDER granting 66 Motion for Reconsideration; GRANTING 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Pel Hughes Printing, LLC, John Victor Hughes. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 1/22/19. (jrc) |
Filing 65 ORDER AND REASONS: GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. Is GRANTED in part as to Plaintiff's claims under the Family Medical Leave Act and DENIED in part as to Plaintiff's claim under intentional infliction of emotional distress. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff be deposed within the next forty-five (45) days. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 12/4/2018. (ajn) |
Filing 48 ORDER: ORDERED that the Defendant's 17 Motion to Fix Attorney's Fees is GRANTED and that the Defendants are awarded reasonable attorneys fees in the amount of $1,080.00. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff and her counsel shall satisfy their obligation to the Defendants no later than twenty-one (21) days after the signing of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (mp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.