Moody v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
| De'on Moody, Keith Ingraham, Scott Kinley, Roland Wilson, Dana Womack, Drexell Ziegler, Jermaine Bell, Paul Weathersby and Antonio Robinson |
| Associated Wholesale Grocers Inc |
| 2:2017cv10290 |
| October 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| St Tammany |
| Jane Triche Milazzo |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0216 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
161
ORDER AND REASONS: DENYING 134 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo on 09/25/2020. (am)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER that the Defendants Motion for Attorneys Fees 98 is GRANTED. Defendant is awarded reasonable attorneys fees and expenses in the amount of $1,535.63. FURTHER ORDERED that Counsel for the Opt-In Plaintiffs, Chad A. Danenhower and Dale Edward Williams, shall satisfy its obligation to Defendants no later thantwenty-one (21) days from the issuance of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 12/6/2019. (caa)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER AND REASONS: GRANTING 105 MOTION to Decertify Collective Action. The Court DECERTIFIES this collective action, and the claims of all opt-in Plaintiffs are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo on 11/14/2019.(am)
|
|
Filing
96
MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby: Motion Hearing held on 8/15/2019 re 90 MOTION to Quash and for Protective Order Prohibiting the Deposition of President and CEO, David Smith. IT IS ORDERED tha t the 90 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. FURTHER ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED to the extent it seeks a protective order on the time, scope and duration of the deposition. FURTHER ORDERED that t he Plaintiffs provide to the Court a list of deposition topics no later than Thursday, August 15, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. FURTHER ORDERED that the motion is DENIED to the extent it seeks an order from this Court quashing the deposition and to the extent that it seeks the Court impose limitation on the location of the deposition. FURTHER that parties reschedule the deposition to any date prior to the scheduled pretrial conference. Parties must provide the Court the details of the renotice deposition no later than Friday, August 16, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. (Court Reporter Toni Tusa.) (mp)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER AND REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Class Certification (Rec. Doc. 35 ) is GRANTED; and Defendant's Motion to Strike (Rec. Doc. 43 ) is DENIED, as set forth in document. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff&# 039;s Complaint is conditionally certified to proceed as a collective action under the FLSA, defining the following class of people: "All individuals employed by AWG from October 7, 2014 to the present, who held the position of supervisor in AWG 's Pearly River facility." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall provide Plaintiff in electronic form the names, last known addresses, e-mail addresses, and telephone numbers of potential collective action plaintiffs within 14 days of the filing of this Order. Finally, the parties shall submit within 30 days of this Order a joint proposed notice form that includes a proposed length for an opt-in period. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo on 1/11/2019. (sa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
