In re: Debra Guthans
| Debra Guthans |
| DLN Properties, Ltd and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| U.S. Trustee |
| 2:2017cv10554 |
| October 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Jane Triche Milazzo |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER AND REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that the Bankruptcy Court's September 28, 2017 order granting Appellee JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s motion for summary judgment is hereby REVERSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that case number 17-10554 be REMAND ED to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Bankruptcy Court's November 16, 2017 order denying Appellee Debra Guthans' motio n to compel Chase to amend its proof of claim is hereby REVERSED and RENDERED. The motion to compel is hereby GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that case number 17-12719 be REMANDED to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties' request for oral argument is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan.(Reference: Both Cases)(bwn)(NEF: Bankruptcy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
