Marriott International, Inc. v. Danna
| Marriott International, Inc. and Sheraton Operating Corporation |
| Deon Danna |
| 2:2017cv10590 |
| October 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Ivan L.R. Lemelle |
| Daniel E. Knowles |
| Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 0004 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Deon Danna's 36 motion to dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiffs' claim against Defendant is DISMISSED, as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 8/22/2018. (jls)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' 32 motion is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiffs seek leave to file an amended complaint and DENIED insofar as Plaintiffs seek reconsideration of the dismissal of their original Complaint. The proposed pleading (Rec. Doc. 32-2) attached to the motion shall be filed into the record, subject to the conditions stated infra. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 4/4/2018.(jls)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's 10 motion to dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as set forth in document. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' 9 motion to compel arbitration is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 1/18/2018. (jls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
