Davies v. LeBlanc et al
| A. J. Davies |
| James LeBlanc, L.S.P. Medical Staff, Darryl Vannoy, University Medical Center and Unidentified Parties |
| 2:2017cv12575 |
| November 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Out of State |
| Susie Morgan |
| Michael North |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER AND REASONS - Before the Court is 65 Third MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendants Tracy Falgout, Stephanie Lamartiniere, Randy Lavespere, and Cynthia Park. For the reasons set forth herein, the motion is DENIED as to Counts 1, 2, and 3, and the Court's ruling on qualified immunity on those Counts is DEFERRED. The motion is GRANTED as to Count 4. Parties to further comply as set stated herein. FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall hold a telephone status conference with all parties on 7/22/2020 at 10:15 a.m. The Court will provide call-in instructions for this status conference. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 7/8/2020.(sbs)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER AND REASONS - For the reasons herein, Defendant's 73 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. A ruling on Defendant's motion to dismiss is DEFERRED, and Plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 6/12/2020.(sbs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
