Brenckle v. MacFay et al
| Clint Brenckle |
| Dr. MacFay, Dr Cleveland and Warden Tanner |
| 2:2017cv13500 |
| November 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Washington |
| Carl Barbier |
| Daniel E. Knowles |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 . IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Rec. Doc. 50) is GRANTED and that the remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 3/10/21.(cg)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 27 . IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 21) is hereby DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART. The motion is DENIED with respect to the claim that Dr. McVea, in his individual capacity, violate d Plaintiff's federal constitutional rights by refusing to provide him with a continuous positive airway pressure machine. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in all other respects and that all other claims against Dr. McVea are he reby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's "Motion for Post-Conviction Relief," Rec. Doc. 25, be DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to his ability to seek federal habeas corpus relief in a separate proceeding. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 8/27/2019.(cg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
