Heintz v. Lawson et al
| David Heintz |
| Arthur Lawson, Anthony Christiana and Gretna City |
| 2:2018cv00366 |
| January 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Jefferson |
| Nannette Jolivette Brown |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1988 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' 29 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, as set forth in document. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 7/18/2019. (jls)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' 6 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED INPART to the extent that Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims against Lawson and Christiana based on a theory of respondeat superior and in their official capacity, P laintiff's Louisiana Whistleblower Act claims against Lawson and Christiana, and Plaintiff's request for punitive damages against the City of Gretna are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in all other respects. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Rule 7(a)(7) reply as to Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims against Lawson and Christiana in their individual capacities and to amend the complaint withinfourteen days of this Order to cure the deficiencies noted, if possible. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 1/7/2019. (mmv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
