Dufrene v. American Tugs, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Anne Dufrene
Defendant:	American Tugs Inc
Case Number:	2:2018cv00554
Filed:	January 18, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office:	New Orleans Office
County:	Jefferson
Presiding Judge:	Mary Ann Vial Lemmon
Presiding Judge:	Daniel E. Knowles
Nature of Suit:	Marine
Cause of Action:	46 U.S.C. § 30104
Jury Demanded By:	None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 31, 2019	Filing 75 ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 69 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court is DENIED and the Order of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon on 1/31/2019. (ajn)
December 10, 2018	Filing 62 ORDER that the Motion to Quash and for Protective Order 12 and the Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendant to Respond to Discovery 18 are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as outlined herein. FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Compel Production of Recorded Phone Calls 13 is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Tug and Barge Solutions, L.L.C. to Respond to Subpoena Duces Tecum and for Contempt 52 is GRANTED IN PART for the reasons expressed on pages 13-17 supra. FURTHE R ORDERED that the submission date on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Tug and Barge Solutions, L.L.C. to Respond to Subpoena Duces Tecum and for Contempt 52 is CANCELLED but that for Plaintiffs Second Motion to Compel Defendant to Respond to Discovery and for Sanctions 51 remained in place on the briefs on 12/5/2018. The Court denies all requests for sanctions and attorneys fees at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Knowles, III on 12/10/2018. (caa)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 31, 2019

Filing 75 ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 69 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court is DENIED and the Order of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon on 1/31/2019. (ajn)

December 10, 2018

Filing 62 ORDER that the Motion to Quash and for Protective Order 12 and the Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendant to Respond to Discovery 18 are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as outlined herein. FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Compel Production of Recorded Phone Calls 13 is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Tug and Barge Solutions, L.L.C. to Respond to Subpoena Duces Tecum and for Contempt 52 is GRANTED IN PART for the reasons expressed on pages 13-17 supra. FURTHE R ORDERED that the submission date on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Tug and Barge Solutions, L.L.C. to Respond to Subpoena Duces Tecum and for Contempt 52 is CANCELLED but that for Plaintiffs Second Motion to Compel Defendant to Respond to Discovery and for Sanctions 51 remained in place on the briefs on 12/5/2018. The Court denies all requests for sanctions and attorneys fees at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Knowles, III on 12/10/2018. (caa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dufrene v. American Tugs, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anne Dufrene
Represented By:	Beth Elster Abramson
Represented By:	David Alan Abramson
Represented By:	Paul M. Sterbcow
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: American Tugs Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?