Payton et al v. Southern Fidelity Insurance Company
| Steven Payton and Dionne Payton |
| Southern Fidelity Insurance Company |
| 2:2018cv02365 |
| March 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Carl Barbier |
| Daniel E. Knowles |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER that the Motion to Fix Attorneys Fees 78 is GRANTED. SFIC is awarded reasonable attorneys fees in the amount of $262.50. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs, Steven and Dionne Payton, shall satisfy their obligation to SFIC no later than fourteen (14) days from the issuance of this Order or by 10/27/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas on 10/13/2021. (caa)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER AND REASONS granting 65 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Southern Fidelity Insurance Company. Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 7/20/21. (cg)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER AND REASONS DENYING 41 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 7/31/2020. (my)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER AND REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (Rec. Doc. 12 ) is DENIED, as set forth in document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Knowles, III on 11/5/2018. (sa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
