Jones et al v. Associated Marine Terminals, LLC et al
Sheila Jones |
Associated Marine Terminals, LLC, Turn Services, LLC and Associated Marine Equipment, LLC |
Robert Harris |
Associated Terminals LLC and Turn Services, L.L.C. |
2:2018cv02438 |
March 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Jefferson |
Martin L.C. Feldman |
Daniel E. Knowles |
Marine |
46 U.S.C. ยง 30104 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 CONSENT JUDGMENT: ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Associated Marine Equipment, L.L.C.'s 36 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Seaman Status is hereby granted, and that the Plaintiffs' alternative claims, including those under 33 U.S.C. 905(b) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, fail as a matter of law and are hereby dismissed with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Associated Marine Equipment, L.L.C.s 35 Motion for Partial Summa ry Judgment on Punitive Damages is hereby granted, and that the Plaintiffs' claims against Associated Marine Equipment, L.L.C. to recover punitive damages under the Jones Act for employer negligence and/or for unseaworthiness under general maritime law are hereby be dismissed. (Reference: 18-2438, 18-2568)(clc) |
Filing 28 ORDER AND REASONS denying as moot 23 Motion to Dismiss Civil Action Number 18-2568. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 6/13/2018. (Reference: Both Cases)(clc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.