Max Foote Construction Company, L.L.C. v. MWH Constructors, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Louisiana Eastern District Max Foote Construction Company, L.L.C. v. MWH Constructors, Inc.

Max Foote Construction Company, L.L.C. v. MWH Constructors, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Max Foote Construction Company, LLC
Defendant:	MWH Constructors, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2018cv02584
Filed:	March 12, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office:	New Orleans Office
County:	St Tammany
Presiding Judge:	Susie Morgan
Presiding Judge:	Daniel E. Knowles
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 25, 2018	Filing 46 ORDER AND REASONS: ORDERED that MWH's 22 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended and Supplemental Complaint and MWHs 34 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint are GRANTED as to MFCC's pro mpt-pay claims brought under Louisiana law and unjust enrichment/quantum meruit claim brought under New Jersey law, and DENIED as to MFCC's prompt-pay claim brought under New Jersey law and as to MFCC's unjust enrichment claim brought under Louisiana law. FURTHER ORDERED that any federal Prompt Payment Act claim raised in MFCC's complaint is dismissed. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 10/25/2018. (clc)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 25, 2018

Filing 46 ORDER AND REASONS: ORDERED that MWH's 22 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended and Supplemental Complaint and MWHs 34 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint are GRANTED as to MFCC's pro mpt-pay claims brought under Louisiana law and unjust enrichment/quantum meruit claim brought under New Jersey law, and DENIED as to MFCC's prompt-pay claim brought under New Jersey law and as to MFCC's unjust enrichment claim brought under Louisiana law. FURTHER ORDERED that any federal Prompt Payment Act claim raised in MFCC's complaint is dismissed. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 10/25/2018. (clc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Max Foote Construction Company, L.L.C. v. MWH Constructors, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MWH Constructors, Inc.
Represented By:	Charles Matthew Thompson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Max Foote Construction Company, LLC
Represented By:	Matthew R. Emmons
Represented By:	Mark W. Mercante
Represented By:	Nicholas R. Pitre
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?