Lee v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
| Jessie Lee |
| Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Barry Grodsky, Cheri Cotogno Grodsky, BMRC Properties, LLC, Brian Mahon and Unidentified Parties |
| 2:2018cv02887 |
| March 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Kurt D. Engelhardt |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Other Fraud |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER AND REASONS regarding 57 Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous and 72 Motion for Entry of Default. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 57) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's § 1983 claim against the GAA Defendan ts is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's § 1983, PTFA, and TILA claims against all other defendants in this matter are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and that all state law claims in this matter are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default (Rec. Doc. 72) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 7/25/2019. (cg)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER denying 24 Motion to Dismiss Party and 35 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Plaintiff shall have 14 days from the issuance of this Order in which to effect proper service, after which his case shall be dismissed. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 3/6/2019. (cg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
