Spikes v. Louisiana State
Plaintiff: Jason Jarrel Spikes
Defendant: Louisiana State
Case Number: 2:2018cv03759
Filed: April 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Concordia
Presiding Judge: Susie Morgan
Presiding Judge: Janis van Meerveld
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Jason Jarrel Spikes' claim against the State of Louisiana be and hereby is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan.(bwn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spikes v. Louisiana State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Jarrel Spikes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Louisiana State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?