Horizon Navigation Ltd. v. Progressive Barge Line, Inc. et al
| Horizon Navigation Ltd. |
| Progressive Barge Line, Inc., Barge PBL 3001 and Justice M/V |
| 2:2018cv04497 |
| May 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Out of State |
| Eldon E. Fallon |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Environmental Matters |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER AND REASONS DENYING 63 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 3/21/2019. (jeg)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER & REASONS that 3rd-Party Defendant Ausca Shipping Limited's motion to dismiss Progressive Barge Line Inc.'s Complaint against it is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. R. Doc. 34 . To the extent Ausca seeks dismissal of Progressive 's direct claims against it, the motion is DENIED. To the extent Ausca seeks to dismiss the complaint tendered by Progressive pursuant to Rule 14(c), the motion is DENIED; however, the claims against Ausca brought against it by Horizon via Prog ressive's Rule 14(c) tender are hereby STAYED pending the outcome of contractually mandated arbitration. In other words, Horizon's claims against Progressive and Progressive's claims against Ausca and Horizon remain, while Horizon's claims against Ausca pursuant to Progressive's Rule 14(c) tender are stayed pending the outcome of arbitration, if any. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 2/5/19. (dno)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
