Topps Company, Inc. v. Lapeyrouse, et al
||Topps Company, Inc.
||Paul Joseph Lapeyrouse, Jr and Funtime Xiamen Candy Co., Ltd.
||May 9, 2018
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
||New Orleans Office
||Out of State
||Nannette Jolivette Brown
||Daniel E. Knowles
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 17, 2019
ORDER AND REASONS GRANTING 12 Motion to Dismiss Party. FURTHER ORDERED that Topps is granted ninety (90) days from the date of this Order & Reasons to properly effectuate service on Lapeyrouse in accordance with Rule 4(e) of the Federal Rules of C ivil Procedure. If Topps does not do so, Topps claims against Lapeyrouse will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m), unless Topps can demonstrate that its efforts at service are more in line with Conwill v. Greenberg Traurig and like cases. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 1/17/2019. (clc)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?