Corkern v. Stranco Field Services, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Louisiana Eastern District Corkern v. Stranco Field Services, LLC

Corkern v. Stranco Field Services, LLC

Plaintiff:	Connie Corkern
Defendant:	Stranco Field Services, LLC
Case Number:	2:2018cv05566
Filed:	June 1, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office:	New Orleans Office
County:	Terrebonne
Presiding Judge:	Ivan L.R. Lemelle
Presiding Judge:	Joseph C. Wilkinson
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 26, 2018	Filing 10 ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that the 4 motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS ORDERED that defendant's partial motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and that plaintiff's sexual harassment claims under TitleVII are DISMISS ED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Defendant's motion is DENIED IN PART as to plaintiff's car and meal reimbursement claim under the Equal Pay Act. Defendant's motion is DENIED IN PART at this time as to plaintiff's redu ced salary claim under the Equal Pay Act. Corkern must file a motion for leave to file an amended complaint, no later than October 10, 2018, to specify how male Stranco employees receiving higher salaries performed job functions requiring equivalent skill, effort, and responsibility as Corkern in her position as Human Resources Director. If plaintiff fails to do so, this claim will be dismissed by the court without further briefing as set forth in document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr on 9/26/28. (mmv)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 26, 2018

Filing 10 ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that the 4 motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS ORDERED that defendant's partial motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and that plaintiff's sexual harassment claims under TitleVII are DISMISS ED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Defendant's motion is DENIED IN PART as to plaintiff's car and meal reimbursement claim under the Equal Pay Act. Defendant's motion is DENIED IN PART at this time as to plaintiff's redu ced salary claim under the Equal Pay Act. Corkern must file a motion for leave to file an amended complaint, no later than October 10, 2018, to specify how male Stranco employees receiving higher salaries performed job functions requiring equivalent skill, effort, and responsibility as Corkern in her position as Human Resources Director. If plaintiff fails to do so, this claim will be dismissed by the court without further briefing as set forth in document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr on 9/26/28. (mmv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Corkern v. Stranco Field Services, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Connie Corkern
Represented By:	John Eric Bicknell, Jr.
Represented By:	Galen M. Hair
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Stranco Field Services, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?