Jefferson Parish, et al v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, et al
| Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District Number 1, Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2 and Jefferson Parish |
| McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma LP, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Allergan PLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Actavis LLC, Cardinal Health, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Purdue Pharma Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Noramco, Inc., Mallinckrodt, PLC, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. |
| 2:2018cv06343 |
| June 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Jefferson |
| Nannette Jolivette Brown |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan PLC, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Mallinckrodt, PLC, McKesson Corporation, Noramco, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Purdue Pharma Inc, Purdue Pharma LP, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons, #14 Summons, #15 Summons, #16 Summons, #17 Summons, #18 Summons, #19 Summons, #20 Summons)(mm) |
| Filing 4 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint. Filing attorney filed the cover sheet as the main document and the complaint as an attachment. For future filings, the complaint should always be the main document and the cover sheet should be filed as an attachment to the main document. Clerk took corrective action. No further action is required. (mm) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (ess) |
| Filing 2 Summons Submitted for Issuance (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons, #14 Summons, #15 Summons, #16 Summons, #17 Summons, #18 Summons, #19 Summons, #20 Summons)(Villio, Deborah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-6974023) filed by Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District Number 1, The Parish of Jefferson, Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Deborah A. Villio added to party Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2(pty:pla), Attorney Deborah A. Villio added to party Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District Number 1(pty:pla), Attorney Deborah A. Villio added to party The Parish of Jefferson (pty:pla).(Villio, Deborah) (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/29/2018) (mm). (Attachment 1 replaced on 6/29/2018) (mm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
