Reel Pipe, LLC v. USA Comserv, Inc.
Reel Pipe, LLC and Reel Pipe LLC |
USA Comserv, Inc. |
2:2018cv06646 |
July 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Lafourche |
Eldon E Fallon |
Michael North |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #2 Request for Summons Issued. **Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of Summons. The pdf should not have the purple boxes nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action. No further action necessary.** (jeg) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to USA Comserv, Inc.. (jeg) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Eldon E. Fallon and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (ess) |
Filing 2 Request of Summons Issued as to USA Comserv, Inc. filed by Reel Pipe, LLC re #1 Complaint,. (Harowski, Michael) (Main Document 2 replaced on 7/12/2018) (jeg). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-6996079) filed by Reel Pipe, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1)Attorney Michael A Harowski added to party Reel Pipe, LLC(pty:pla).(Harowski, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.