2025 N Broad LLC v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company et al
2025 N Broad LLC |
Wright National Flood Insurance Company, City of New Orleans, Sewerage and Water Board of the City of New Orleans and New Orleans City |
2:2018cv07456 |
August 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Orleans |
Ivan LR Lemelle |
Janis van Meerveld |
Insurance |
42 U.S.C. § 4001 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #15 Answer to #7 Amended Complaint. **Filing attorney used incorrect event, (answer to amended complaint) and incorrectly linked this answer to document 7, the amended complaint. Clerk took corrective action by changing the event and properly linked document to the original complaint, document 1** (jls) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by New Orleans City.(Macnamara, Mark) Modified text/edited linkage on 9/26/2018 (jls). |
Filing 14 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #11 Waiver of Service Executed. **Filing attorney entered incorrect date for the date the waiver was sent to Wright National Flood Insurance Company. Waiver sent on 8/10/2018, answer due 10/9/2018. No further action is necessary.** (jls) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed; New Orleans City served on 8/15/2018, answer due 9/25/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Return)(Camel, Beau) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Sewerage and Water Board of the City of New Orleans served on 8/17/2018, answer due 9/7/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Return)(Camel, Beau) |
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Wright National Flood Insurance Company on 8/10/2018, answer due 10/9/2018. (Camel, Beau) Modified waiver date/answer due date on 9/19/2018 (jls). |
Filing 10 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the #9 motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file responsive pleadings by Tuesday, 9/25/2018. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 9/6/2018. (jls) |
Filing 9 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint by New Orleans City. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Mark Daniel Macnamara added to party New Orleans City(pty:dft).(Macnamara, Mark) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to New Orleans City, Sewerage and Water Board of the City of New Orleans. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(jls) |
Filing 7 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL AND AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by 2025 N Broad LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Camel, Beau) Modified text on 8/10/2018 (jls). |
Filing 6 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #4 Summons Submitted for Issuance. **The original complaint contains only two defendants listed on the caption of the case. The City of New Orleans is not a listed party on the caption, therefor, summons will not be issued for that party.** (jeg) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Sewerage and Water Board of the City of New Orleans. (jeg) |
Filing 4 Summons Submitted for Issuance (Camel, Beau) |
Filing 3 Summons Submitted for Issuance (Camel, Beau) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (ess) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7046219) filed by 2025 N Broad LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Beau F. Camel added to party 2025 N Broad LLC(pty:pla).(Camel, Beau) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.