Moses v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
Eddie Moses |
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc. |
2:2018cv07638 |
August 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Jefferson |
Jane Triche Milazzo |
Michael North |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PRETRIAL ORDERS. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo.(ADI) |
Filing 4 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint, "Document's signature line is either incomplete or blank. All future documents must reflect either an original signature or an electronic signature of the filing attorney following the format 's/ (attorney name)'. No further action is required at this time." (tk) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. (tk) (Main Document 3 replaced on 8/14/2018) (tk). |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (ess) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7055361) filed by Eddie Moses. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)Attorney John C. Enochs added to party Eddie Moses(pty:pla).(Enochs, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.