Fennidy et al v. Christ the King Parish School et al
Toyonita Parquet and Montrelle Fennidy |
Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans, Christ the King Parish School, Christ the King Roman Catholic Church and Dawn Swear Castillo |
2:2018cv08258 |
August 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Martin LC Feldman |
Janis van Meerveld |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice as to Christ the King Parish School, Dawn Swear Castillo, and the Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans by All Plaintiffs. (O'Boyle, Inemesit) |
Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #6 MOTION to Expedite Consideration of Motion to Dismiss.ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim be submitted for consideration on the 18th day of September, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. The merits of this motion are referred to the substantive hearing on September 18, 2018. The parties shall all comply with the previously issued scheduling order. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 9/7/2018.(clc) |
Filing 6 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Expedite Consideration of #5 Motion to Dismiss by Dawn Swear Castillo, Christ the King Roman Catholic Church, Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(Knoll, Dylan) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Dawn Swear Castillo, Christ the King Roman Catholic Church, Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans. Motion(s) will be submitted on 10/3/2018. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Notice of Submission)Attorney Dylan Karl Knoll added to party Christ the King Parish School(pty:dft).(Knoll, Dylan) |
Filing 4 ORDER: ORDERED that all issues set for hearing on September 6, 2018 by Orleans Parish Civil District Court instead will be taken up on September 18, 2018 at 9:00 A.M by this Court, and the September 6, 2018 date is hereby continued to September 18, 2018. The orders of the Orleans Parish Civil District Court shall remain in place until further orders of this Court. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit simultaneous briefing of all contested issues, including the propriety of removal to this Court, no later than September 11, 2018 at 9 A.M. Both sides shall also simultaneously submit witness lists of those witnesses that will be called to testify. Each side will be allotted three hours for their presentation and argument. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 8/30/2018.(clc) |
Filing 3 DIRECTIVE pursuant to 28:1447(b) filed by Clerk. (clc) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Martin L.C. Feldman and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (gk) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, case number 2018-08411 L(6) (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7091488) filed by Dawn Swear Castillo, Christ the King Parish School, The Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A in globo, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) Attorney Dylan Karl Knoll added to party Dawn Swear Castillo(pty:dft), Attorney Dylan Karl Knoll added to party Christ the King Parish School(pty:dft), Attorney Dylan Karl Knoll added to party The Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans(pty:dft).(Knoll, Dylan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.