Thomas v. Louisiana State Police et al
| Darvie Thomas |
| Russell E Sibley and Louisiana State Police |
| 2:2018cv10200 |
| October 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Lance M Africk |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint. **Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of Summons. The pdfs should not have the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action.** (sbs) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Louisiana State Police, Russell E Sibley. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(sbs) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (gk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Louisiana State Police, Russell E Sibley (Filing fee $400 receipt number 053L-7202494) filed by Darvie Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) Attorney Willard James Brown, Sr added to party Darvie Thomas(pty:pla).(Brown, Willard) (Attachments 3-4 replaced on 11/1/2018) (sbs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
