Nehus v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
| Bertha Nehus |
| Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., John Does 1-5, Bayer AG, Janssen Research & Development LLC, Bayer Pharma AG, Johnson and Johnson, Bayer HealthCare AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Jansen Ortho LLC, Unidentified Party and Johnson & Johnson |
| 2:2018cv11957 |
| November 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Eldon E Fallon |
| Michael North |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
PRETRIAL ORDERS #1 - #31. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon.(ADI)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer HealthCare AG, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Jansen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson and Johnson. (ss) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Eldon E. Fallon and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (cc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7269889) filed by Bertha Nehus. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Edward A. Wallace added to party Bertha Nehus(pty:pla).(Wallace, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
