Etheridge v. Tanner et al
| Sharod Stephen Etheridge |
| Phillup, J. Tynes, Crawford, Floyd Brooks, Robert Tanner, Nick, Sistrunk, Colonel Crawford, Sgt. Magee, Sale, Beverly Kelly, Lt. Dillon, Waskom, Colonel Harrell, Dillion, Jeffrey Rogers, Billy Anderson, Harrell, Bowens and Herbut |
| 2:2019cv00295 |
| January 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Lance M Africk |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Considering the application and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's application is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 2/19/2019.(ajn)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Complaint. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 2/6/2019. (sbs) |
| Filing 1 **DEFICIENT** COMPLAINT with jury demand against Billy Anderson, Bowens, Floyd Brooks, Crawford, Dillion, Lt. Dillon, Harrell, Herbut, Beverly Kelly, Sgt. Magee, Nick, Phillup, Jeffrey Rogers, Sale, Sistrunk, Robert Tanner, J. Tynes, Waskom filed by Sharod Stephen Etheridge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(sbs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
