Verrett v. Vannoy et al
Plaintiff: Bernard F. Verrett
Defendant: Darrel Vannoy
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Case Number: 2:2019cv00351
Filed: January 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Carl Barbier
Referring Judge: Michael North
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2019 Filing 9 RESPONSE to #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) by Attorney General State of Louisiana.(Doskey, Ellen) Modified text on 3/13/2019 (cg).
March 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time. ORDERED that the District Attorney for Terrebonne Parish be granted a thirty-day extension to file its response to the petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 3/11/19. (clc)
March 7, 2019 Filing 7 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Attorney General State of Louisiana. Motion(s) referred to Michael North. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Ellen Daigle Doskey added to party Attorney General State of Louisiana(pty:res).(Doskey, Ellen)
February 13, 2019 Filing 6 Return of Service of Habeas Corpus served on Louisiana DOJ on 2/11/2019(cg)
February 12, 2019 Filing 5 Return of Service of Habeas Corpus served on Terrebonne Parish DA Office on 2/11/2019(cg)
February 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Habeas Corpus Response Order that Attorney General for the State of Louisiana and the District Attorney for Terrebonne Parish respond to the petition of Habeas Corpus within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 2/5/19. (Attachment(s): #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (clc).
February 1, 2019 Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Bernard F. Verrett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cg)
February 1, 2019 Filing fee paid from Bernard F. Verrett re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Filing fee $ 5) (cg)
January 17, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 2/7/2019. (cg)
January 17, 2019 Filing 1 DEFICIENT: PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Bernard F. Verrett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Verrett v. Vannoy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernard F. Verrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darrel Vannoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Represented By: Ellen Daigle Doskey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?