Cook v. SyncStream Solutions LLC, et al
Erika Cook |
Cindy Heine, SyncStream Solutions LLC AKA DBA Enact LLC, SyncStream Solutions, LLC and Enact |
2:2019cv00387 |
January 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Barry W Ashe |
Joseph C Wilkinson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Order Vacating Case Referral to Magistrate Judge - This Court having been advised that all parties to this proceeding do not consent to proceed to trial before a Magistrate Judge; IT IS ORDERED that the automatic referral of this matter to the Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 73.2 is hereby VACATED. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 3/13/2019. (NEF: Mag. 2)(sa) |
Filing 8 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr: Scheduling Conference held on 3/12/2019. All parties have not consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Accordingly, the presiding district judge is hereby notified so that he may revoke the automatic referral and schedule a conference to set pretrial and trial dates on her calendar. Initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) must be exchanged no later than 3/26/2019. (NEF: Sect M) (caa) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Cindy Heine, SyncStream Solutions, LLC. Attorney Molly C McDiarmid added to party Cindy Heine(pty:dft).(McDiarmid, Molly) Modified text on 3/6/2019 (mmv). |
Filing 6 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that a preliminary conference is hereby SCHEDULED in thismatter on MARCH 12, 2019, at 10:30 a.m., before Magistrate Judge Joseph C.Wilkinson, Jr., 500 Poydras Street, Hale Boggs Building, Room B409, New Orleans,Louisiana. The purpose of the conference is to determine if all parties consent to proceed before a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), and to plan future proceedings and set dates and deadlines, if appropriate. Parties who wish to participate in the conference by telephone may do so by contacting the undersigned magistrate judge's chambers at 504-589-7630 at the appointed time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr on 2/14/2019.(mmv) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint as to SyncStream Solutions, LLC answer due 3/5/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr on 2/13/2019. (mmv) |
Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint,, by SyncStream Solutions, LLC. Motion(s) referred to Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Molly C McDiarmid added to party SyncStream Solutions, LLC(pty:dft).(McDiarmid, Molly) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Cindy Heine, SyncStream Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(sa) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Barry W Ashe and Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr. (ess) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Cindy Heine, SyncStream Solutions LLC. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7370197) filed by Erika Cook. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit P-1, #3 Exhibit P-2, #4 Exhibit P-3, #5 Exhibit P-4, #6 Exhibit P-5, #7 Exhibit P-6, #8 Exhibit P-7, #9 Exhibit P-8, #10 Exhibit P-9, #11 Exhibit P-10, #12 Exhibit P-11, #13 Summons, #14 Summons, #15 Summons) Attorney Glenn Charles McGovern added to party Erika Cook(pty:pla).(McGovern, Glenn) Modified text on 1/22/2019 (sa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.