Harris v. Complete Logistical Services , LLC et al
| Shawana Harris |
| Complete Logistical Services, LLC and Spencer Sens |
| 2:2019cv01169 |
| February 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Eldon E Fallon |
| Martin LC Feldman |
| Michael North |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Complete Logistical Services, LLC, Spencer Sens. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(clc)(CC: Pla w/ copy of Pauper Order & Pauper Letter) |
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 2/13/19. (Attachments: #1 Pauper Letter) (clc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Case transferred to Judge Eldon E. Fallon. Judge Martin L.C. Feldman no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 2/11/2019. (NEF: Sec F, and Sec L)(jeg)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE Regarding Local Civil Rule 54.7.(jeg) |
| Filing 2 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shawana Harris. Motion(s) referred to Michael North. (jeg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Complete Logistical Services, LLC, Spencer Sens filed by Shawana Harris. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(jeg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
