Kraemer v. Pipeline Construction & Maintenance Inc
Plaintiff: Catheresa Kraemer
Defendant: Pipeline Construction & Maintenance Inc and Pipeline Construction & Maintenance, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv01186
Filed: February 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Dana Douglas
Referring Judge: Ivan LR Lemelle
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2019 Filing 8 ANSWER to #6 First Amended and Restated Complaint, with Jury Demand by Pipeline Construction & Maintenance, Inc.(Quinn, Talbot) Modified text on 3/27/2019 (jls).
March 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, as to Pipeline Construction & Maintenance, Inc. Defendants shall file responsive pleadings no later than 3/27/2019. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 3/7/2019. (jls)
March 8, 2019 Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Pipeline Construction & Maintenance, Inc. filed by Catheresa Kraemer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Murphy, Kerry) Modified text on 3/11/2019 (am). Modified text on 3/27/2019 (jls).
March 1, 2019 Filing 5 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Plead re #1 Complaint, by Pipeline Construction & Maintenance, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Talbot M Quinn added to party Pipeline Construction & Maintenance, Inc.(pty:dft).(Quinn, Talbot) Modified text on 3/4/2019 (am).
February 15, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Pipeline Construction & Maintenance, Inc. served on 2/12/2019, answer due 3/6/2019. (Murphy, Kerry) Modified text on 2/19/2019 (jls).
February 8, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Pipeline Construction & Maintenance Inc. (am)
February 8, 2019 Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (gk)
February 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Pipeline Construction & Maintenance Inc (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7414939) filed by Catheresa Kraemer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Summons)Attorney Kerry Ann Murphy added to party Catheresa Kraemer(pty:pla).(Murphy, Kerry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kraemer v. Pipeline Construction & Maintenance Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pipeline Construction & Maintenance Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pipeline Construction & Maintenance, Inc.
Represented By: Lauren Lopresto Tafaro
Represented By: Talbot M Quinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catheresa Kraemer
Represented By: Kerry Ann Murphy
Represented By: Catherine Elena Lasky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?