Vesoulis v. ReShape Lifesciences, Inc.
| Paul Vesoulis |
| ReShape Lifesciences, Inc. f/k/a Enteromedics Incorporated and ReShape LifeSciences, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv01795 |
| February 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Dana Douglas |
| Martin LC Feldman |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/27/2020 01:30 PM before Judge Martin L.C. Feldman. Jury Trial set for 3/16/2020 09:00 AM before Judge Martin L.C. Feldman. All discovery must be completed by 1/30/2020. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 4/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Pretrial Notice Form) (NEF: MAG-3)(cbs)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE - Scheduling Conference set for 4/18/2019 09:45 AM before case manager, by telephone. (cbs) |
| Filing 9 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #8 Answer to Complaint. **Document should have been linked to another document by checking the box 'Should the document you are filing link to another document' or by selecting a related document on other appropriate screen. Clerk took corrective action by linking document to document 1. No further action necessary.** (jeg) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Petition for Damages with Jury Demand by ReShape LifeSciences, Inc. (Kelly, Shannon) Modified text on 3/21/2019 (jeg). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Notice of Removal. ReShape Lifesciences, Inc. be and is hereby granted an extension until 3/27/2019 to file responsive pleadings herein. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 3/7/2019. (jeg)
|
| Filing 6 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer . **Document should have been linked to another document by checking the box 'Should the document you are filing link to another document' or by selecting a related document on other appropriate screen. Clerk took corrective action by linking document to document 1. No further action necessary.** (jeg) |
| Filing 5 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Notice of Removal by Reshape Lifesciences Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Webre, Rachel) Modified text on 3/7/2019 (jeg). |
| Filing 4 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Notice of Removal. **Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of the Summons. The pdf should not have the green header nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action.** (clc) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Martin L.C. Feldman and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (ess) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by ReShape Lifesciences, Inc. identifying ReShape Medicial, Inc., EnteroMedics, Inc., ReShape Medicial, LLC as Corporate Parents or Affiliates. (Webre, Rachel) Modified text on 3/1/2019 (clc). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 24th Judicial District Court, Jefferson Parish case number 791-122 N (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7452050) filed by ReShape Lifesciences, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A) Attorney Rachel G. Webre added to party ReShape Lifesciences, Inc. (Webre, Rachel) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/1/2019) (clc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
