Canedo v. 3M Company et al
Chris Canedo and Christopher Canedo |
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company |
2:2019cv01897 |
March 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Barry W Ashe |
Dana Douglas |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER - In accordance with the Court's Second Show Cause Order, Canedo's failure to cure the jurisdictional allegations must result in the action's dismissal without prejudice. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in document, IT IS ORDERED that the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 3/21/2019.(sa) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed; 3M Company served on 3/7/2019, answer due 3/28/2019. (Geiger, Andrew) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Aearo Technologies, LLC served on 3/7/2019, answer due 3/28/2019. (Geiger, Andrew) |
Filing 8 EXPARTE/CONSENT Joint MOTION to Stay re #1 Complaint, by 3M Company and Christopher Canedo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order)Attorney Jay M. Mattappally added to party 3M Company(pty:dft).(Mattappally, Jay) Modified text/filers on 3/21/2019 (sa). |
Filing 7 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Christopher Canedo (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Geiger, Andrew) |
Filing 6 SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - IT IS ORDERED that Canedo's motion for leave to file his first amended complaint (Rec. Doc. #5 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties show cause as to why this matter should not be dismissed due to the absence of diversity under 28:1332. Canedo shall have fourteen (14) days from the entry of this order to submit: (1) a response sufficiently alleging the citizenship of Christopher Canedo and the identity of all the members of Aearo Technologies LLC and the state of citizenship of each member as of the date of March 1, 2019, and (2) if appropriate, a motion for leave, pursuant to 28:1653, to amend the jurisdictional allegations of the complaint to adequately allege diversity subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 3/15/2019.(sa) |
Filing 5 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Order to Show Cause by Christopher Canedo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Pleading)(Geiger, Andrew) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to 3M Company, Aearo Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(sbs) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: ORDERED that the parties show cause as to why this matter should not be dismissed due to the absence of diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Plaintiff shall have 14 days from the entry of this order to submit: (1) a response sufficiently alleging the citizenship of Christopher Canedo and the identity of all the members of Aearo Technologies LLC and the state of citizenship of each member as of the date of 3/1/2019, and (2) if appropriate, a motion for leave, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1653, to amend the jurisdictional allegations of the complaint to adequately allege diversity subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 3/1/2019.(blg) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Barry W Ashe and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (cc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 053L-7456727) filed by Christopher Canedo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)Attorney Andrew J. Geiger added to party Christopher Canedo(pty:pla).(Geiger, Andrew) Modified text on 3/4/2019 (sbs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.