Conn v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
Linda Conn |
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Sun Pharma Global FZE, Sandoz, Inc., Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Actavis LLC, Hospira, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Accord Healthcare, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Hospira Worldwide, LLC |
2:2019cv02399 |
March 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Jane Triche Milazzo |
Michael North |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (gk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Accord Healthcare, Inc., Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Hospira Worldwide, LLC, Hospira, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sandoz Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sun Pharma Global FZE, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7483030) filed by Linda Conn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons)Attorney John Christopher Elliott added to party Linda Conn(pty:pla).(Elliott, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.