Blake v Schiller, Jr.
| Michael E Blake |
| John D Schiller, Jr. |
| John D. Schiller |
| 2:2019cv10160 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Nannette Jolivette Brown |
| Michael North |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 00 U.S.C. ยง 0000 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CONSENT JUDGMENT as set forth in document. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 5/15/2019.(mmv) |
Filing 4
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the #3 Motion is GRANTED and the attached Consent Judgment should be filed of record in this matter. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 5/15/2019. (mmv)
|
| Filing 3 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File Consent Judgment by Michael E Blake. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Order - Consent Judgment)(Riess, Michael) Modified text on 5/15/2019 (mmv). |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (ess) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John D. Schiller Jr. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7627554) filed by Michael E Blake. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) Attorney Michael R.C. Riess added to party Michael E Blake(pty:selreq).(Riess, Michael) Modified text on 5/8/2019 (mmv). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
