White v. New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Company
| Ryan White |
| New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Company |
| 2:2019cv10389 |
| May 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Carl Barbier |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| P.I.: Other |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Company.(Talley, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer as to New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Company. Answer due 6/28/2019. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 6/5/2019. (cg)
|
|
Filing 4
EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Matthew Robert Slaughter added to party New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Company(pty:dft).(Slaughter, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Company. (cg)
|
|
Filing 2
Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl Barbier and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (gk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with jury demand against New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Company (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7643426) filed by Ryan White. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Jeremiah Nathan Johns added to party Ryan White(pty:selreq).(Johns, Jeremiah)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
