Reese v. Social Security Administration
| Tyna Reese |
| Nancy A Berryhill and Social Security Administration |
| 2:2019cv10497 |
| May 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Dana Douglas |
| Jane Triche Milazzo |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Pauper Letter)(caa) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas on 5/17/2019. (cc: Counsel) (caa)
|
| Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (cc) |
| Filing 2 EXPARTE/CONSENT First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tyna Reese. Motion(s) referred to Dana Douglas. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Proposed Order)(Leavitt, Melanie) Modified text/referral on 5/17/2019 (sa). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (In Forma Pauperis status requested) filed by Tyna Reese. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) Attorney Melanie Anne Leavitt added to party Tyna Reese(pty:pla).(Leavitt, Melanie) Modified text on 5/17/2019 (sa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
