Hoffpauir v. GEICO Casualty Company
| Sarah Hoffpauir and Sarah E. Hoffpauir |
| GEICO Casualty Company |
| 2:2019cv10955 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Jane Triche Milazzo |
| Michael North |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Compliance by GEICO Casualty Company as to #1 Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 State Court Pleadings Exhibit 1 in globo)(Cronin, Stephen) Modified text/event on 6/24/2019 (sa). |
| Filing 3 Directive of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b) re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by GEICO Casualty Company. Issued by Clerk. (sa) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (cc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Civil District Court, case number 2018-12662 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7692289) filed by GEICO Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Original Petition, #3 Exhibit Tender Demand Letter, #4 Exhibit Dismissal, #5 Exhibit Amended Petition, #6 Certificate of Service)Attorney Stephen Dale Cronin added to party GEICO Casualty Company(pty:dft).(Cronin, Stephen) (Attachments 1-5 reduced legal pages, flattened images & replaced on 6/10/2019) (sa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
