Robinson v. New Orleans College Preparatory Academies
Dionne Robinson |
New Orleans Preparatory Academies and New Orleans College Preparatory Academies |
2:2019cv10963 |
June 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Lance M Africk |
Joseph C Wilkinson |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2609 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to New Orleans College Preparatory Academies on 6/11/2019, answer due 8/12/2019. (King, Danatus) |
Filing 4 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #3 Summons Issued. **Clerk erroneously issued summons. Complaint states 'Waiver of Service Requested'. Disregard summons issued. Clerk has modified the docket text for the Complaint to note Waiver. No further action necessary.** (sbs) |
Filing 3 **FILED IN ERROR** Summons Issued as to New Orleans College Preparatory Academies. (sbs) Modified text on 6/10/2019 (sbs). |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr. (cc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against New Orleans College Preparatory Academies (Filing fee $400 receipt number 053L-7692432) filed by Dionne Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) Attorney Danatus Norman King added to party Dionne Robinson(pty:pla).(King, Danatus) (WAIVER OF SUMMONS). Modified text on 6/10/2019 (sbs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.