SAPS, LLC v. EZCare Clinic, Inc.
| SAPS, LLC |
| EZCare Clinic, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv11229 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Carl Barbier |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion filed by EZCare Clinic, Inc. re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . (ko) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to File Reply. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 7/30/19. (ko)
|
| Filing 9 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by EZCare Clinic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading, #2 Proposed Order)(Sahuc, Richard) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by SAPS, LLC re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(Latino, Dominick) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by EZCare Clinic, Inc.. Motion(s) will be submitted on 7/31/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration of Vasili Razhnou, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Notice of Submission)(Sahuc, Richard) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant is granted an additional twenty-one (21) days from the date on which responsive pleadings would otherwise be due to file said pleadings. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 6/21/2019. (cg)
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Compliance with Clerk's Directive Re: Removal by EZCare Clinic, Inc. re #3 Order. (Attachments: #1 State Court Pleadings)(Sahuc, Richard) |
| Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by EZCare Clinic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sahuc, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Directive by the Clerk re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by EZCare Clinic, Inc. (clw) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl Barbier and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (cc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 22nd Judicial District Court, St. Tammany Parish, case number 2019-12533 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7707084) filed by EZCare Clinic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Petition, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Lawsuit, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Richard Thomas Sahuc added to party EZCare Clinic, Inc.(pty:dft).(Sahuc, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SAPS, LLC v. EZCare Clinic, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SAPS, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Dominick Joseph Latino |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: EZCare Clinic, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Richard Thomas Sahuc |
| Represented By: | Gregory D. Latham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
