Use v. Larpenter et al
| Johnny Joe Adam Use |
| Jerry J Larpenter, W Johnson and Gordon Dove |
| 2:2019cv11612 |
| July 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Wendy B Vitter |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court terminate the #3 Deficiency Notice for purposes of entering this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's application is DENIED because plaintiff has not submitted "a certified copy of the trust fund account (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint" as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby.(mp)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Complaint and #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 8/1/2019. (jeg) |
| Filing 2 **DEFICIENT** EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Johnny Joe Adam Use. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (jeg) |
| Filing 1 **DEFICIENT** COMPLAINT against Gordon Dove, W Johnson, Jerry J Larpenter filed by Johnny Joe Adam Use. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jeg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
