Robertson v. Proforce USA
| Davonte T. Robertson |
| PROFORCE USA/PROFORCE LLC, Proforce USA and Proforce LLC |
| 2:2019cv11916 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Lance M Africk |
| Joseph C Wilkinson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint. **Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of Civil Cover Sheet. The pdf should not have the purple boxes nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action. No further action necessary.** (pp) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr. (cc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against PROFORCE USA/PROFORCE LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7777900) filed by Davonte T. Robertson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney William Martin McGoey added to party Davonte T. Robertson(pty:pla).(McGoey, William) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/30/2019) (pp).Waiver of service. Modified text on 7/30/2019 (pp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
