Maas Shipping Ltd. et al v. F.R. BIGELOW M/V et al
| Hellas Confidence Shipmgmt SA, Maas Shipping Ltd., OSR Rotterdam BV, NST Enterprise SA, Belships ASA and Belships Management Singapore |
| M/V F.R. BIGELOW, M/V CSS ATLANTA, Carline Management Company, Inc., Ingram Barge Co. and CSS Atlanta Inc. |
| 2:2019cv12025 |
| August 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Martin LC Feldman |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Martin L.C. Feldman and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (ess) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7788973) filed by Belships ASA, Hellas Confidence Shipmgmt SA, OSR Rotterdam BV, Maas Shipping Ltd., NST Enterprise SA, Belships Management Singapore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit Verification)Attorney Kevin J. LaVie added to party Belships ASA(pty:pla), Attorney Kevin J. LaVie added to party Belships Management Singapore(pty:pla), Attorney Kevin J. LaVie added to party Hellas Confidence Shipmgmt SA(pty:pla), Attorney Kevin J. LaVie added to party Maas Shipping Ltd.(pty:pla), Attorney Kevin J. LaVie added to party NST Enterprise SA(pty:pla), Attorney Kevin J. LaVie added to party OSR Rotterdam BV(pty:pla).(LaVie, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
