Rose v. Progressive Express Insurance Company, et al
| Jeffery Rose |
| Progressive Express Insurance Company, Bernd Mangnitz and Bernie Mangnitz |
| 2:2019cv12243 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Wendy B Vitter |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Notice of Removal. **Filing attorney uploaded document with incorrect caption. Correct document subsequently e-mailed to clerk, and image has been replaced. No further action necessary.** (jeg) |
| Filing 3 DIRECTIVE of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b).(clw) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (ess) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jefferson Parish, case number 24th JDC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7816100) filed by Progressive Express Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit 1 State Court Pleadings, #4 Exhibit 2 State Court Pleadings) Attorney Patrick Dominic DeRouen added to party Progressive Express Insurance Company(pty:dft).(DeRouen, Patrick) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/22/2019) (jeg). Modified text on 8/27/2019. (clw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
