Trim v. Vannoy et al
Joseph H. Trim |
Darryl Vannoy |
Attorney General State of Louisiana |
2:2019cv12369 |
August 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Michael North |
Wendy B Vitter |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER re #4 Response/Reply filed by Joseph H. Trim. The response from petitioner does not alter the deficient nature of the petition or the Report and Recommendation issued by the undersigned on October 7, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 10/21/2019. (dw) (cc: Section D) |
Filing 4 Response/Reply by Joseph H. Trim to #2 Notice of Deficient Filing (jeg) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Joseph H. Trim. RECOMMENDED that the federal application for habeas corpus relief filed by Joseph Trim in the above-captioned matter be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Objections to R&R due by 10/21/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 10/7/2019.(dw) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 9/19/2019. (clw) |
Filing 1 **DEFICIENT** PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Joseph H. Trim. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(clw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.