Bilello v. Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
Denise V Bilello |
Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc. |
Shell Oil Company and Metropolitan Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
2:2019cv12520 |
September 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Barry W Ashe |
Janis van Meerveld |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 10/22/19. (ko) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/23/2019: #1 Remand Letter) (ko). |
Filing 11 EXPARTE/CONSENT Joint MOTION to Remand to State Court by Shell Oil Company, Denise V. Bilello. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Guillory, Daniel) Modified text on 10/21/2019 (am). |
Filing 10 RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in opposition to Motion filed by Metropolitan Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company re #8 Joint MOTION for Order Authorizing the Disbursement of Funds by Civil District Court from Registry and Plaintiff's Motion for Remand of Remaining Claims to State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(O'Bryon, Kevin) Modified text on 10/17/2019 (am). |
Filing 9 ORDER: ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear on October 24, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. to show cause why this Court's subject-matter jurisdiction is established under 28 U.S.C. 1335 when the funds that are the subject of the interpleader have not been deposited into this Court's registry. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 10/11/2019.(clc) |
Filing 8 EXPARTE/CONSENT Joint MOTION for Order Authorizing the Disbursement of Funds by Civil District Court from Registry and Plaintiff's Motion for Remand of Remaining Claims to State Court by Denise V Bilello, Shell Oil Company. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(Drouant, Robert) Modified text on 10/17/2019 (am). |
Filing 7 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #6 Response/Reply.**1. Filing attorney selected incorrect event. Correct event is Notice of Compliance. Clerk took corrective action by changing the text. **2. Filing attorney incorrectly linked document to document 3. Clerk properly linked document to document 1.** (am) |
Filing 6 Notice of Compliance re #1 Notice of Removal by Shell Oil Company to (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Guillory, Daniel) Modified text on 9/23/2019 (am). |
Filing 5 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #4 Answer to Complaint. Document should have been linked to another document by checking the box 'Should the document you are filing link to another document' or by selecting a related document on other appropriate screen. Clerk took corrective action by linking document to document 1. (clw) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal by Shell Oil Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Guillory, Daniel) Modified text/linkage on 9/18/2019 (clw). |
Filing 3 Directive of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b) re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Shell Oil Company. By the Clerk.(am) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Barry W Ashe and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (aj) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, case number 2017-10352 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7848186) filed by Shell Oil Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)Attorney Daniel P. Guillory added to party Shell Oil Company(pty:intpld).(Guillory, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.