D'Amico v. Juul Labs, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: Frank Douglas D'Amico
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc., Pax Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc. and Altria Group Inc
Case Number: 2:2019cv12628
Filed: September 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Janis van Meerveld
Referring Judge: Sarah S Vance
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER VACATING CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER: The Panel has now been advised that a notice of voluntary dismissal was filed in D'Amico on October 11, 2019, in the Eastern District of Louisiana. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Panel's conditional transfer order designated as "CTO-1" filed on October 7, 2019, is VACATED insofar as it relates to this action.Signed by Clerk of the Panel. (Attachments: #1 CTO-1)(my)
October 11, 2019 Filing 10 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #9 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. **Document does not contain Section and Magistrate Judge. All future pleadings must reflect Section R and Magistrate 1. 2. Document lists counsel of record, Mekel Smith, for a party in this action who has not been enrolled in this matter. Future filings which list attorneys not enrolled will not be accepted. Please file a motion and order to enroll additional counsel.** (mm)
October 11, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice as to All Defendants by Frank Douglas D'Amico. (Scalia, David)
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER STAYING CASE - Many similar cases have been transferred to MDL Case Number 2913, In re: Juul Labs, Inc., Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. This case was also been identified as a possible tag-along action, and the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation will make a determination concerning whether this case should be transferred to the Multidistrict Litigation Panel. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that all proceedings in this case are hereby stayed pending the decision of the Multidistrict Litigation Panel regarding transfer. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 9/24/2019.(cg)
September 24, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Party Response to Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation re MDL 2913. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter)(mm)
September 23, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Action to Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation re MDL 2913 by Frank Douglas D'Amico. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter)(mm)
September 17, 2019 Filing 5 Rico Standing Order. by Clerk on 9/17/19.(jjs)
September 17, 2019 Filing 4 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint. **Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of the civil cover sheet and the summons requested. The pdf should not have the blue boxes nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action.** (mm)
September 17, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Altria Group, Inc., Juul Labs, Inc., Pax Labs, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(mm)
September 16, 2019 Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Sarah S. Vance and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (aj)
September 16, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7857366) filed by Frank Douglas D'Amico. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)Attorney James R. Dugan, II added to party Frank Douglas D'Amico(pty:pla).(Dugan, James) (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/17/2019) (mm). (Attachment 2 replaced on 9/17/2019) (mm). (Attachment 3 replaced on 9/17/2019) (mm). (Attachment 4 replaced on 9/17/2019) (mm).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: D'Amico v. Juul Labs, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pax Labs, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Altria Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Altria Group Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank Douglas D'Amico
Represented By: James R. Dugan, II
Represented By: Frank Jacob D'Amico, Jr.
Represented By: David Scott Scalia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?