Whitener v. St. Charles Parish et al
| Rachel Whitener |
| St. Charles Parish and Clayton Faucheux |
| 2:2019cv12696 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Ivan LR Lemelle |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1988 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies by Clayton Faucheux, St. Charles Parish. Motion(s) will be submitted on 12/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Declaration, #3 Exhibit A-1 - Grievance Summary/Description, #4 Exhibit A-2 - Grievance Response, #5 Exhibit A-3 - Correspondence to State Court, #6 Exhibit A-4 - Emails 6/14/19-6/21/19, #7 Exhibit A-5 - Emails 6/19/19-6/26/19, #8 Notice of Submission)(Foster, Russell) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, as to Clayton Faucheux, St. Charles Parish answer due 11/8/2019. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 10/16/19. (ko)
|
| Filing 10 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, by Clayton Faucheux, St. Charles Parish. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Russell L. Foster added to party Clayton Faucheux(pty:dft), Attorney Russell L. Foster added to party St. Charles Parish(pty:dft).(Foster, Russell) Modified text on 10/16/2019 (jls). |
| Filing 9 **DEFICIENT EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, by Clayton Faucheux, St. Charles Parish. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Russell L. Foster added to party Clayton Faucheux(pty:dft), Attorney Russell L. Foster added to party St. Charles Parish(pty:dft).(Foster, Russell) Modified on 10/15/2019 (pp).** |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Clayton Faucheux served on 9/26/2019, answer due 10/17/2019. (Smith, J.) Modified text on 10/3/2019 (jls). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed; St. Charles Parish through the Department of Public Works and Wastewater served through Public Works Director on 9/26/2019, answer due 10/17/2019. (Smith, J.) Modified text on 10/3/2019 (jls). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed; St. Charles Parish through the Department of Public Works and Wastewater served through Parish Attorney on 9/26/2019, answer due 10/17/2019. (Smith, J.) Modified text on 10/3/2019 (jls). |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Clayton Faucheux, St. Charles Parish. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(jls) |
| Filing 4 Summons Submitted for Issuance (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Schmidt, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint. **Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of the civil cover sheet. The pdf should not have the header nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action.** (jls) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (aj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7864587) filed by Rachel Whitener. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney J. Arthur Smith, III added to party Rachel Whitener(pty:pla).(Smith, J.) (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/20/2019) (jls). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
