Otto v. Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc.
Renee Otto |
Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc. and AD Astra Recovery Services, Inc |
2:2019cv12816 |
September 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Susie Morgan |
Michael North |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion filed by Renee Otto re #9 MOTION to Dismiss with Certificate of Service MOTION to Stay re #1 Complaint, Notice of Deficient Filing, #7 Notice (Other), Notice of Deficient Filing,, MOTION to Compel Arbitration with certificate of service . (Imbraguglio, Niko) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion to Dismiss or Stay proceedings and Compel Arbitration. Defendant may file their response up to and including 12/11/19. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 11/21/19. (ko) |
Filing 11 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to #9 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration by Renee Otto. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Imbraguglio, Niko) Modified text on 11/21/2019 (sbs). |
Filing 10 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #9 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration - The filing attorney selected an invalid date for submission. Available submission dates can be found on the courts website. The submission date has been changed to 11/27/19, which is the next available submission date before the assigned judge. No further action necessary. (bwn) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration by AD Astra Recovery Services, Inc. Motion(s) will be submitted on 11/27/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Declaration of Tracy Bengtson, #3 Declaration of Charles Ellison, #4 Memorandum in Support, #5 Notice of Submission)(Oakes, Blake) Modified on 11/8/2019 to edit docket text (bwn). |
Filing 8 PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE NOTICE - Scheduling Conference set for 12/19/2019 at 10:00 AM before case manager by telephone. Signed by Clerk.(bwn) |
Filing 7 **DEFICIENT** NOTICE by AD Astra Recovery Services, Inc re Notice of Deficient Filing, with Certificate of Service. (Oakes, Blake) Modified text on 11/1/2019 (sbs). |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by AD Astra Recovery Services, Inc.(Oakes, Blake) Modified text on 10/24/2019 (sbs). |
Filing 5 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by AD Astra Recovery Services, Inc (Oakes, Blake) |
Filing 4 **DEFICIENT** MOTION to Compel Arbitration , MOTION to Dismiss , MOTION to Stay re #1 Complaint, with certificate of service by AD Astra Recovery Services, Inc. Motion(s) will be submitted on 10/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memo, #2 Exhibit Agreement, #3 Statement Declaration of Tracy Bengtson, #4 Statement Declaration of Charles Ellison)Attorney Blake Edward Oakes added to party AD Astra Recovery Services, Inc(pty:dft).(Oakes, Blake) Modified text on 10/24/2019 (sbs). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc. (sbs) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Susie Morgan and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (go) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 053L-7872319) filed by Renee Otto. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) Attorney Niko Angelo Imbraguglio added to party Renee Otto(pty:pla).(Imbraguglio, Niko) Modified text on 9/25/2019 (sbs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.